The unofficial fan blog of Columbia University football. (My previous CU Lions blog ran from 2005-2011 at http://roarlions.blogspot.com/)
Monday, April 23, 2018
Spring Game 2018
With five more months to go until the season, you need a good book to pass the time (More on that later)
It's been a brutal "spring" here in New York as far as the weather goes, but Saturday's warmer temperatures and clear skies set a great stage for the 2018 spring game and the conclusion of Head Coach Al Bagnoli's fourth spring practice since becoming head coach in early 2015.
Overall, the depth and talent on the team is so much improved from 2015 that it's impossible to express that fact in words. But it's worth trying to write it down just for the record.
In bullet point form, here are the 10 highlights as I saw them:
1) They put red jerseys without numbers on all five QB's, so it was often hard to tell who was in the game at any given moment. But it was clear that rising sophomores Josh Bean and Dillon Davis were getting most of the snaps. Both looked pretty good, making a lot of deep throws, especially down the sidelines. Sources tell me Bean is considered the front runner for the starting job at this moment, but almost everyone also believes Davis will get at least significant playing time.
After the game, Bean told he felt good about his chances and also that he'd like to run the ball more than he was allowed to in the spring game for obvious reasons.
2) Rising junior WR Ronald Smith was simply a thing of beauty along the sidelines. Despite the fact that rising junior CB Ben McKeighan was doing an excellent job in coverage every time, Smith was able to get just enough space to make acrobatic grab after grab.
3) The other star Lion WR, Josh Wainwright, was open quite often down the seam and had a stellar game as well. It certainly doesn't look like any of the QB's are out of sync with Columbia's historically deep and talented corps of receivers.
4) The defense was dominant against the run, but also seemed to control the line of scrimmage much of the time. Rising sophomore LB Justin Woodley had some standout plays, especially a screen pass that he absolutely blew up for a big loss.
5) The offensive looked better and bigger than we've seen it in a long time. I'm not going to count the weak running game against them with all the transition going on there.
6) The competition was fierce at times, as evidenced by a short after-the-whistle altercation between rising juniors DL Arman Samouk and OL Joe Scowden.
7) The secondary looked good despite the amazing catches so many receivers were making all day. Honestly, it would take a top level FBS group of DB's to shut down our receivers at this point.
8) The only two significant injured players in attendance were LB Michael Murphy, who looks like he's recovering nicely from his ACL tear against Harvard last season, and WR Christian Everett, who didn't seem seriously hurt.
9) The D-line had a lot of added quickness and even some bulk. Rising senior Mike Hinton was bigger, and rising sophomores Cooper Wilson, Andrew Nichols, and Ogonna Oraedu looked fast. Samouk was tough even on plays that didn't end in scuffles. Daniel DeLorenzi looked good and recovered from his injury issues last year.
10) The kicking game seemed generally fine. Rising senior Chris Alleyne may be more than just the kickoff specialist this fall based on some of his booming punts. Rising sophomore P Drew Schmid had a few too. K Oren Milstein looked solid.
Again, overall this may have been the most encouraging spring game we've ever seen. The main question about the 2018 Lions will be all about the QB position, and there was no need for despair about that position based on what we saw Saturday.
Abbruzzese can write!
All-time great Columbia RB Greg Abbruzzese '91 has put together a fine new novel that combines suspense, action, good ol' South Boston lingo, and... Ivy League Football.
Yes, it's true. He somehow managed to get all those themes together in a book that I'd call a fun combination of "The Departed," "Love Story," and "Everybody's All American."
Buy your copy today by clicking here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Jake, thanks for the encouraging review! Any word on Broderick Taylor?
Great analysis Jake. My guess is that we will see a running back by committee arrangement; that is what Al did much of the time at Penn. Tanner Thomas is an accomplished back who does a lot of things well. there were three other backs who got some reps. Lynnard Rose seems to have given up his baseball career and was on the sideline as I recall. I have always thought that he could be more than a third down guy and has good enough speed to turn the corner. One other point of interest involved first year TE Casey Mariucci. He made an Andrew Kennedy type of catch on a deep seem route; right now I don't think he ahs the bulk to be a blocking TE but he can be a real receiving threat.
Jake, PS, Were you and other Columbia athletics supporters as disgusted as I was by that phony op ed piece by Mark Rudd which the times chose to run yesterday? Anybody who was around in 1968 will tell you that the "gym in the park" was a phony issue which provided a bunch of spoiled brats with an excuse to damn near destroy Columbia. Morningside Park was one of the most dangerous places in Manhattan in the 1960s. That gym would have made the park viable, would have provided community access, and would have put Columbia in a far, far better position in terms of appropriate campus athletic facilities.
The old lion is correct. The Columbia-Community gymnasium in Morningside Park was a great idea and was approved unanimously by every legislator in the City and State of New York. Even the New York Times enthusiastically supported the proposed gym. Not a single representative of the Harlem Community or elsewhere raised any objection to the plan from the time it was first proposed in the year 1960 to just before the 1968 riots. Columbia was and still is the only college in the United States to propose to build a gymnasium at its sole cost for the surrounding community. In 1968, some idiot objected to the community gym on the grounds that there was a separate entrance door to the community gym. The architects explained that the door was planned, of course, to allow persons from the Harlem Community to enter and leave the gym without having to climb up six flights to Morningside Drive. Columbia offered to change the plans which would have taken about 15 minutes to accomplish. However, that was not good enough for the ignorant radical groups who were just looking for trouble. So looking back 50 years later, the question is what good if anything did they achieve for the Harlem Community and Columbia. Inasmuch as no gymnasium was ever built in its place for the Harlem Community, the answer is clearly and tragically "nothing."
When I saw Greg Abbruzzese's name at the bottom of your current column about Columbia Football's Spring Game (a column I particularly enjoyed), I just had to share with you and your other readers a memory of meeting Greg in the Columbia Colllege Alumni Office, which, in the late '80s, was located in the basement of Hamilton Hall. Greg, as I recall, was on a work-study program in that office.
Greg didn't know me, but I knew he was a hell of a running back and was a graduate of Exeter. As a graduate of Andover myself, I wanted to introduce myself and chat for a moment or two, which I did. I was also thinking, how did Columbia recruit, because of the "Streak, such a gifted athlete.
Finally, I saw the Homecoming win against Princeton and went wild like everyone else.
Thanks, Greg, for that incredible memory. I have never forgotten it.
Tod Hawks....also enjoyed watching Greg play and even more so meeting him later in person in 2011
Go Greg with the new book
and Go Exeter...screw the blue!
;-)
II was disappointed that so few of your followersall tcommented upon the game and upon your OVERWHELMINGLY OPTIMISTIC scouting report. I had to read it twice to ensure that I didn't misinterpret your evaluations. Happily, I agree with a lot you say. Given Coach Bagnoli's effusive post game comments, there is more than ample reasn to believe that our Lions will have a good chance to replicate last season's success. A few comments of my own.
Re our QBs: No one has cannon like Hill, but the top 3 all have strong accurate arms. I also think that Bean's extensive duties as our goal line wildcatter bodes well. As a frosh, he was thrown into highly pressurized first and goal situations time and time again and handled those situations like s veteran. I think he'll be more than ready to handle the pressure of being the starting QB. You have to love his toughness as well. And he can run too!
Receivers All I can is Wow! And two of our top incoming frosh are WRs too. If our talented OL plays up too it's potential and gives our QBs time to throw, the upside is tremendous.
RBs. Lots of unknowns here with exception of Tanner. Many tend to overlook him, but let's look at his track record. He played a lot as frosh. He started ahead of the very talented Schroer for the better part of last season. While he lacks outside or breakaway speed, he's a smart and tough inside runner and good receiver. If our Oline lives up to expectations re run blocking, he'll be a quality back. He's great at finding the hole and fighting for that extra yard upon contact. With opposing coaches worried about our passing attack, he will have many opportunities to shine.
Kicking game and special teams will be awesome and may well be the difference makers in the close contests.
Lastly, it was great to hear how well our D line played and how much they have improved. If they can come close to the level of last year, our D will be formidable.
Lots to look forward to. And it would be a wonderful appetizer if Boretti can get his guys into the playoffs. We'll know a lot more after the Penn series.
While Im not quite ready to go to Jake's level of enthusiasm
What's with Lynnard Rose?
Coming out of high school in Texas, Rose, now a rising junior, was a three-time All-State defensive back and running back, and was recruited by, and admitted to, all 8 of the Ivy League schools before choosing Columbia.
You would have expected him to be tearing up the League by now.
Yet, Rose has gained only 73 rushing yards on 15 carries at Columbia.
Oldlion said he saw Rose on the sidelines throughout the Spring game this past Saturday. I assume Oldlion was suggesting Rose was injuried. If so, what is the injury, and what is the prognosis?
Also, do we have a better running back than Tanner waiting in the wings (including the incoming freshman class)? If so, who do you think that is?
3 team members, 2 freshmen & 1 sophomore, have left the men's BB team. Unless our AD is prepared to immediately replace the HC, there's no reason to expect a turnaround from last season's disappointing results. Do not understand why this hasn't already happened.......
One hoop player left to walk on at Michigan (homesick). That's understandable because his family could rarely watch him play (although the Ivy League network was GREAT). The other Frosh is leaving to go to a Big 5 school - good luck! He thinks he's better than he is. The Soph - no clue why? Let's remember, this coach was late in recruiting. We should give him time. I agree that this year's class (2018) is still not that great and we should not expect big things. Maybe he should try a JUCO or two and feed them through GS?
I think that the negative comments about Coach Engles miss the mark. A new coach needs a minimum of three and as many as 5 years to rebuild a program... Seems like everyone is ready to
discard a quality guy... Needless to say that when a high caliber recruit unexpectedly leaves the program (Jared Faulds) the coach is placed in a more difficult spot!.... I think that all CU fans were spoiled to some extent by Kyle Smith but fear not Coach Engles will have us roaring again and sooner than you think... Robert Pelletreau
Jake, when will the AD release the official list? I see that the Harvard list is out.
Post a Comment