The W.C. Matthews Trophy belongs to CU!
I’m still on a high after attending Columbia’s two game
sweep of Dartmouth to win the Ivy League Baseball Championship series. It was
such a great day for Columbia and the fans in every way. Winning the Ivy
baseball title in 2008 was great, but we had to watch that series on the
internet as the games were in Hanover, NH. This time, there was a standing room
only crowd getting into every pitch all afternoon long with perfect weather to
boot.
The baseball team showed all the qualities we’d like to see
the football team acquire, especially coming through in the clutch.
It’s a great thing that Head Coach Pete Mangurian regularly uses Facebook and Twitter to praise the
baseball team, as it shows he recognizes what it takes to succeed in Columbia
sports.
I hope Columbia gets a chance to play somewhere relatively
close to New York in the NCAA regionals. We won’t find out until the end of
this month.
Spring Game
A better, more detailed analysis of the spring
game/scrimmage/demonstration is surely coming from Mangurian’s own keyboard
probably by tonight, so I will keep my impressions short and hopefully a little
different from what you’re likely to see elsewhere.
I mostly liked what I saw Saturday night.
I liked the new format for the “spring game,” as it helps
focus on individual units of the team.
I liked the emphasis on getting the younger players more
playing time and saving the sure starters from possible injury. (That’s a
tradition Mangurian started last year and it’s a sound practice. Look up "Chad Musgrove" if you don't know what I'm talking about).
I liked the way Augie Braddock, (I wrote "Augie Williams" before because I miss that dude), and Cameron Molina played, giving me hope that we have the deepest
running talent Columbia has seen in about 10 years.
I liked the way Trevor
McDonagh is clearly good enough to start in the Ivies. I think he may get a
lot of snaps early in the season when Columbia is playing its non-conference
schedule and Brett Nottingham gets
more used to the system. I still think Nottingham is our starter, but McDonagh
is making that decision a little tougher to make. And that’s what every
football team needs to happen at every position.
My dream of seeing a NYC-HS recruit turn into a Lion star
got a shot in the arm thanks to the play of rising sophomore Toba Akinleye Saturday night
I also agree with Mangurian’s assessment of the tight end
play. It was improved and has suddenly become an area where Columbia seems to
have good depth.
I like the way the secondary is starting to look. It’s still
#3 on my list of units I’m worried about, (#1 is the O-line, #2 are the
linebackers), but with Malcom Thaxton’s
improved play, it’s less of a concern.
Speaking of the linebackers and O-line, there was nothing
there to make me worry more… but I’m
still about as concerned as I can be. Without marked improvement from the
offensive line, Columbia won’t accomplish much this fall. And if the linebacker
play deteriorates, the challenge to improve on last year’s 3-7 record will be
steep.
Again, for a more detailed and reliable analysis of the
performances on the field let’s wait for the official release from Mangurian
today or tonight.
Here’s my overview on where we are as we head into the
loooong wait before training camp begins in late August:
Mangurian and the players can only focus on improving
themselves. The trouble is, much of what will determine Columbia’s fate in 2013
is the schedule of opponents. Unless the Lions make significant improvements to
every unit of the team, even matching last year’s 3-7 record will be difficult.
That’s no fault of the players or Mangurian, it’s just the nature of the game.
There are reasons to be optimistic, mostly on offense. I can’t
remember the last time Columbia had this much real talent in the passing and
running games. That kind of balance can make up for a lot of problems in other
parts of a team, within reason.
The other reason to be optimistic is at least the defensive
line seems to be shaping up quite well despite the graduation loss of Josh Martin. There’s a deep level of
talent at DE and DT, and that should help reduce any major problems at
linebacker.
But it keeps coming back to depth, doesn't it?
I remember before the 2007 spring game, and how good I was
feeling about the Lions after their strong 2006 finish. Then, someone from the
athletic department who I've known for a long time reminded me that depth was
still a problem for the team. And sure enough, 2-3 injuries during the fall of
that year doomed Columbia to a 1-9 season.
Now we have a team that has actual talented depth at QB, RB,
WR, TE, and on the DL. The secondary may not be too far behind. I wish the
O-line looked better now even though I know it will be better by the time the
season starts. That needs to happen.
For the next 137 days until the season kicks off, we’ll be a
bit in the dark about what this team is capable of. That’s the nature of the beast. So let me
apologize in advance for the kinds of “grasping at straws” posts you might see
here in the summer months.
17 comments:
Quick correction Jake - #44 is Alec Fisher, no longer Augie "Triple Dogg" Williams. Glad to hear he had a good day running the ball.
"I liked the way Trevor McDonagh is clearly good enough to start in the Ivies." For which Ivy is McDonagh better than the projected starter?
Jake, did you see any of the recruits? If so, are they big etc.?
McDonagh is better than any QB Yale has right now.
Unless Fordham, Penn and Dartmouth make significant improvements, the Lions should be quite competitive vs. them.
Fordham is indeed a lot better than the team we faced early last year. The Rams got better every week and seem to have figured out how to use their athletic scholarships properly now. Dartmouth will be better and will be playing us at home. Penn has the gutsiest QB in the Ivies in Ragone, who knows how to win, even if it is winning ugly.
In the Ivies, with a very weak OL, and the first year of the new coaching regime, we were not competitive in two Ivy games. We were competitive in the other five. In our non-league schedule we were not competitive in one of three games. Overall we were competitive in seven games of which we won three. I simply think that Jake is being too negative. I think we will be a much stronger and more talented team across the board this year.
Jake's comments about OL sounds like CU will have a real challenge ahead. I have heard a lot about the struggles last year, but it is disconcerting that it appears we have not really addressed significant improvements in that area.I was hoping to hear a more encouraging report about this issue from the spring game.
I counted roughly 11 2013 recruits in attendance
We can have Brett Nottingham at QB and he can be the best QB in the Ivy League but he won't win any games for us if we have a weak O-line.
I'm actually very POSITIVE about Columbia's improvement. But I am being realistic about our opponents. What we did last year is irrelevant. Fordham is a better team than it was last year and we play them on the road this time. Monmouth is a better team than Marist. Lehigh will probably not be as good, but this is a very strong program. Cornell and Yale are road games this year, etc.
Let's harp some more on the much maligned "OL". I believe that Jake is a great asset, but he is way too negative about the toughness of schedule.
And I don't care how many F**ing recruits were there or how big they looked. This coach has a system and it will will not work. See you anonymous guys in September at Fordham!!
Haters can't help themselves.
Jock/Doc needs to silence himself
How does anyone KNOW in May another team has improved! It's not clear the Lions have, in fact.
http://www.columbiaspectator.com/2013/05/07/nbc-new-york-football-player-charged-hate-crime
Chad Washington, rising junior
My post should have read "The coach has a system and it will OR will not work"
Sorry for the typo.
Also, I am really impressed by your comment about silencing myself Mr (Ms ?) Anonymous. I will leave the posting to your clever remarks. :)
Post a Comment