I just got late word that Pete Mangurian and Dianne Murphy
are furious with Seahawks coach Pete Carroll. Instead of doing the honorable
thing like he did when he took full responsibility for the bad call that lost
the Super Bowl last night, Mangurian and Murphy wanted him to blame his untalented players and my blog.
Okay, I made that up.
But I sure found it refreshing to hear
a manager of any kind, in this case Carroll, face the music for his blunder and
not throw a player or anyone else under the bus.
For years now, I’ve been hearing the dubious claim from the
Columbia athletic department and its minions that the real problem is the fact that this blog
allows anonymous critics to bash the program from time to time.
Well, when you can’t beat someone with the facts, resort to
complaining that the rules aren’t fair.
I agree that criticism from anonymous commenters isn’t the
best way to make a point. And yes, people should generally identify themselves
and say their piece openly.
Kinda like I do every day.
And as someone who in addition to this blog writes regular political columns that
generate thousands of mostly negative comments, let me be the first to say: “welcome
to the party pal!”
Getting anonymous criticism is an unavoidable byproduct of
technology. It’s astounding that our administration doesn’t get that, and even
more discouraging that a multi-billion dollar institution can’t take it without
crying like a small child.
Why is it that I and so many other people can take criticism
of all kinds when we make public decisions, or create products and content that
allows for scrutiny and judgment?
Answer: because we’re adults. And also because we’re people who know
that cutting off criticism of any kind or silencing it is a highway to a failure
not unlike our football program.
0-21 anyone?
I wouldn’t bring this up if it weren’t for the
fact that so many people connected to the Columbia administration are so
focused on it themselves.
You’d think that a program with so many losses and so little
success wouldn’t make silencing critics, albeit anonymous ones, such a
priority.
But that’s what it does.
And that sensitivity and weakness really shouldn’t be a
surprise. It’s that kind of weakness of spirit that contributes to our
weaknesses on the field.
I have news for those who think that somehow the full extent
of the football program’s dysfunction would be a secret if it weren’t for this
blog.
It’s NO secret.
If you want it to be a secret, take it up with the
scoreboard operators, not me.
That said, this blog can be an extremely positive tool for Columbia and
it still is most of the time. Most of the incoming committed recruits follow me on Twitter and link to this blog all the time. Clearly, the truth hasn't discouraged them. Good for them.
Meanwhile, when we get news of who the new AD and head
football coach is, I will absolutely use this blog to give them a full and fair
chance to succeed. And if they turn out to be people I already know and admire,
the blog will get behind them so strongly it will make heads spin,
But the blog will also never be a vehicle for silencing
critics. If commenters keep their words clean and decent, and identify
themselves with a consistent Internet name, they won’t be deleted.
It’s as simple as that.
So, when you hear people talking about how this blog is somehow a
problem for recruiting or anything else other than a challenge to the dead
weight in the athletic department, call that “B.S.” for what it is. It’s as
dumb and weak as if Pete Carroll blamed the media for losing the game last
night.
And more than that, you might want to point out that if Columbia
officials spent as much time trying to win as they do trying to silence critics,
we might actually start to win.
And with the hiring of Rick Taylor, (who regrettably has also
been regaled with a lot of B.S. about this blog by folks in and outside
Columbia), I think that coordinated and full effort towards winning has finally
begun.
So let’s get ready to welcome our new AD tonight or tomorrow
with open arms and take it from there.
13 comments:
It doesn't take much to turn a program around. One word is the solution - money. From there, you hire the right people and give them the means to succeed with the best facilities and support you can muster.
Money can be mismanaged but that is another story.
I know the comparison is a bit off because they have scholarships but look at Baylor. Just a few years ago that program was a complete embarrassment, a doormat for the seemingly insurmountable competition in their conference. Now they are not only a national title contender but a model of excellence. They built a practice facility near campus (previously the same problem as Columbia faces now with a drive to get to practice) and are so successful with recruiting they are building a locker room exclusively for alumni when they come back to visit the program. How classy is that?
Not saying Columbia is in Baylor's class but a little bit goes a long way.
Right on Jake. It's a disgrace that some people employed by a great university will work harder at avoiding their jobs than doing them
One of the biggest lies is that criticizing the Admin. poisons the well with the public, etc. I can remember vividly as far back as 3-plus decades ago, as an alum admissions volunteer. that the mere mention of Columbia football at a meeting of applicants or admitted kids, far from NYC, would elicit a big sarcastic laugh, even from the girls.
The apologists can talk all they want…this problem
has always been neglected. That includes men's basketball which recently shows some sign of life but never a league title. Women's basketball has always been atrocious. We have a few solid frosh and sophs, but as always at CU it's wait till next decade. M and W soccer is on a treadmill. Thank goodness for baseball, but a national championship among the aforementioned still wouldn't be an anodyne for the horror of football.
I have a column out today on CNBC.com with lots of very critical attacks on me.
And that's a good thing. Most of the attacks are dumb, but there are some good points too. What's the harm in listening, anonymous or not?
The only harm in such a scenario comes to cowards and defensive people who will never improve.
Imagine if this kind of weakness is indicative of what we bring onto the field every game day. In a way it is, because the garbage we see on the scoreboard is a direct result of the garbage in the athletic dept. offices.
PLEASE GOD, give us a new AD tomorrow with GUTS, and a THICK SKIN who will end the culture of defensive wussiness.
Read your article today Jake (wouldn't have found it unless you mentioned it here, sorry!). Interesting that in today's helmet cam, embedded videography, always connected world that nothing seems to penetrate U.S. society's consciousness as to the reality of what war really is. I am not impressed with hollywood or war movies in general. Some pretty boy actor playing a sniper or the mega millions hollywood earns for itself at the expense of entertainment starved people in an entertainment saturated world is pathetic. It doesn't compare to when FDR ordered the battle of tarawa movie released unedited as the first tangible vestiges to the american public as to what was happening in the pacific. It's all ugly business so how can it be transformed into entertainment is ridiculous.
No matter who the next AD is, the selection marks a new beginning for Columbia Football. We are rooting for whomever that person is and pray
that they have competence and strength.One would certainly hope that the new AD has a more transparent attitude about releasing information to alumni/fans.I'd like this person to say:"this is how we are going to change the culture of losing" instead of treating us like mushrooms ( you know - always in the dark and fed sh!t).
Al - Baylor's winning combination- hired a great coach and opened up admissions.
We know how to make the change- offer the best financial aid package and let some players through the door. It's not rocket science.
Any idea as far as what time tomorrow the athletes will be meeting the new AD? I've been returning here periodically throughout the day expecting that the name would have gotten out by now.
With the way information is shared now, on some level it's impressive that the name isn't out there despite the hire being wrapped up.
True on both counts Coach but i bet they did not know what they really had with Art Briles. I don't think they paid him his worth as a first contract. Today I am sure he is compensated accordingly. I also have no idea what the admission standards were in their dark era. I am no expert with southwest conference era to the present but it seems to me the writing was on the wall for a long time with the lower end programs like Baylor. You either do something drastic or you will get pummeled. It's not a big leap. You have to take action or hang it up.
No offense to any of the people who have written that the cat may be out of the bag on the AD, but what is the big deal?
is it a national secret who CU hires as the next AD? Hardly. Most people outside of this group and some others could not give two craps about who CU hires. Yet it is kept a secret. I understand that there could be some job related issues for the candidate, but this goes to the heart of the matter.
Hiring negotiations are always kept confidential. The leading candidate presumably is currently employed (except of course in Mangurian's case), negotiations do not always succeed, publicity may bring out other suitors, etc.
Al - here is a big difference between a Baylor, and Columbia. Brides was a legendary high school football coach in Texas, and was very successful as the Head Coach at Houston. Can Columbia do likewise?
It would have to be in the early evening to allow all of the athletes a chance to assemble.
Storm caused delays may require a change to this schedule.
Post a Comment