Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Last Chance

The point spreads for this weekend are out and Cornell is an eight-point favorite over the Lions at Wien Stadium.

Needless to say, this game is the best chance for the Lions to win a game this year. The Big Red may actually have a similarly good chance to win next week at home against the much weaker than expected Penn Quakers.

But if Columbia loses on Saturday, we’re looking at finishing the season with a 21 game losing streak, (we have no chance the following week at Brown… none). And we’ll also be faced with having to wait another year for even a shot at ending this streak.

Head Coach Pete Mangurian and the Orwellian drones in the athletic department can talk all they want about “progress,” but a 21 game losing streak is a complete breakdown of a sports team at any level and everyone knows that.

A 21-game losing streak isn’t the product of practice fields or class schedules or financial aid. It's the result of bad coaching, bad recruiting, bad strategy, and mismanagement at every level.

Yes, there are some ingrained problems at Columbia. But a 21-game losing streak is a severe bleeding wound that needs to be bandaged as the first priority.

It appears that the most important priority for the administration now is to make sure no outside group ever gets a chance to review the athletics department. That’s a big reason for the quickie candidacy of the laughably unqualified Ted Gregory for Athletic Director. The hope is that Gregory will placate the alumni by firing Mangurian quickly, thus deflecting the scrutiny that should be placed on his getting the job.

A better scenario is to make Dianne Murphy clean up her own mess, fire Mangurian and then let that outside sports management consulting firm take over the hiring process for Mangurian’s replacement.

The insular Bill Campbell Drinking Club management team has failed us time and again. This has to stop.

If only Bill Campbell employed the kind of tactics at Columbia that he uses in the private sector. In an interview conducted just before this season began, Campbell boasted that he, (he used the word "we," but the decision was all his, who is he kidding?), never even considered firing Mangurian at any point last season.

Never! Really? Even after the 40+ point losses to teams we were beating by that margin just three years earlier? 

Never? Even after the Twitter scandal and bar brawls proved what little control and discipline Mangurian was bringing to the team? 

Never?!?

And this from the man who has been portrayed as a trigger happy firing guy in Silicon Valley. A book released last year recounted just how quick and eager Campbell was to fire Twitter founder Dick Costolo. If only he could be as aggressive with CU football.

When I interviewed Campbell myself in 2009, he boasted about how Silicon Valley was the true center of meritocracy in America. Results and talent and hard work won out, everything else was cut loose. 

One has to consider that Campbell sees Columbia football as some kind of happy respite from that world. And maybe it is... for him.

But as much as I don't want wins alone to be the measure of success for college athletics, the epic failures in football and many of our other sports at Columbia is unacceptable. The fact that sports at CU have become some kind of personal plaything for Bill Campbell alone is even more unacceptable. His involvement and control is well beyond a healthy level. 

And to the groups like CAEC who are trying to make changes and wondering why they've been blocked, the answer is simple: Bill Campbell isn't letting it happen. 

I have to ask, where is the Spectator and WKCR right now? They have rightfully complained about the football collapse, but now they need to use their bully pulpit to pressure the administration to at least keep the alumni and students informed about the A.D. hiring process. The silence is scary, because it confirms that a ridiculous choice like Gregory is indeed in the works.

A short column in the Spec demanding some answers about the A.D. search would go a long way. At this point, everyone is getting shut out. 

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

There is something else in play beyond what Billy is saying. Underperforming the way Pete has is showing spectacular leniency. I've never seen this kind of denial and blindness anywhere. They want to run their affairs like a private boys club yet what is the benefit here? I am not seeing the advantage to the boys. MDM is of course one of the boys.

I had a good laugh about the Twitter episode. It is true, Dick Costolo is a moron. I would love to have been a fly on the wall watching him embarrass Costolo. Why would BillC be interested in that crappy product and company at all? Because he likes to meddle and be involved. It's like being a compulsive gambler. You are going to win simply based on the volume of plays you make but in the process you become a loud, obnoxious wino with a few standout losses that make the highlight reel.

Peter Stevens said...

QThe time is long overdue for Trustee Chief Jonathan Schiller to take action. He's the new Campbell on the Board and has the clout to do what needs to be done and to do it now.

I recommend that all concerned start pressing him to take action. Communicating with Bollinger has not worked.

I would love to see the student body and alums start to vocalize their feelings enmasse during time outs of the basketball games where Schiller can be found sitting court side I/f/o the student section at mid-court.

Peter Stevens '70C 73'L

Chick said...

All that is very interesting, Al, but it doesn't help improve football because Campbell, the Trusters and Bollinger don't give a damn. They won't even talk to BigDawg's CAEC. Unless they have an immediate change of heart, there are only two weapons we have, and maybe both
are needed.
One is to occupy the campus as in 1968, but to save football not to help the Viet Cong. The other is to boycott football and all sports, both in attendance at games in all sports and stopping all donations to CU, athletic or other. Nothing else will get the attention of the autocrats.
Why punish the other sports? Because it's their school too but I hear NO protests from other athletes, coaches, students, faculty and most alums. Football is a hostage to the little boys club and will have to be rescued by battle because begging and all exhortations are ignored.

Anonymous said...

What is very telling during the interview is Bill seemed genuinely surprised that, "oh, you don't know so and so on the board of trustees? We all know him/her very well. We are a diverse group..." Yes, yes, we all know the world is a smaller place now. Let's all be vocal about being diverse and therefore not labeled a racist.

Notice how he shifted the focus of the question? It's not so simple for outsiders to get something as simple as a conversation with a A list member. When you are speaking from on high you lose touch with the peanut gallery (which unfortunately, this forum is).

I like the idea of bombarding every trustee with well crafted pleas for assistance. Even if they end up being more deaf ears and part of the problem, make your voices heard.

Bill Campbell Interview pt I

Bill Campbell Interview pt II

Anonymous said...

Bill Campbell Interview Pt III.

This guy is just lost in the sauce but he has several hundred million reasons not to care what anyone's opinion is. He did drop a name in there who I do have access to for a conversation. Surprising how it did not occur to me earlier.

Mr. Gelegenheit! said...

Yes, Bill Campbell seems pretty comfortable with the way things are going, he's not missing any meals behind this -- "What, me worry?" might be a good title for that interview. Absolutely no sense of urgency there and, from where he sits, why should should there be? He's snug as a bug in a rug. He was a good player and now he's a good bullshitter. Does he really not play golf? He'd be great at it.
Mitch S. 68CC

Anonymous said...

Can't really boycott attending games, since that's pretty much already the case. Many games this year have been under 3,000 in actual attendance. Not the worst attendance in FCS, but getting there fast...

#1 Lion said...

Come on all faithful alum... Let's all go out to the game this weekend and celebrate Pete's final home game!!!

Big Dawg said...

I'll be there, in the parking lot overlooking the baseball field by the two new benches.

A W or an L won't make any diff, so I'm rooting for a W.

Big Dawg said...

Hey, check out this excerpt from a Dartmouth paper. Besides the refs to "external study" and enthusiastic backer", both of which we need, I realized that even if PM goes 7-3 the next 2 years, his record will still be worse than Norries':

"Before that 2009 campaign, Rick Taylor, the onetime Boston University football coach and Northwestern athletic director, conducted an external review of the Dartmouth football program, which subsequently benefitted from improved facilities, better relations with the admissions department, increased coaching salaries and fundraising and the arrival of President Jim Yong Kim, an enthusiastic backer of sports in general and football in particular. Harry Sheehy succeeded Harper as athletic director in 2010, and his arrival gave the department long-term direction.

Since its win over Columbia in 2009, Dartmouth has gone 28-21, while the Lions are 10-39. Wilson was fired after going 1-9 in 2011 and 17-43 overall in five seasons. He was the Lions’ 10th consecutive coach, dating back to 1930, to leave with a losing record. Only one man in that group, Lou Little (1930-56), posted a winning percentage better than .315."

Jake said...

Thanks for flagging that CRUCIAL part of the article that I think I overlooked when I first read it, (and I'm not sure I linked to the article last month either. Here it is:
http://www.vnews.com/sports/14053864-95/the-lions-meow)